Patient R had a left wide local excision and sentinel node biopsy for a screen-detected breast cancer at age 63. Histology showed a 25mm invasive breast cancer of no special type, grade 2, hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, no lymphovascular invasion, with 0/7 lymph nodes, giving a final staging of pT2 pN0.
Full article available to subscribers
Patient R had a left wide local excision and sentinel node biopsy for a screen-detected breast cancer at age 63. Histology showed a 25mm invasive breast cancer of no special type, grade 2, hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, no lymphovascular invasion, with 0/7 lymph nodes, giving a final staging of pT2 pN0. Regional breast multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) recommended discussion regarding endocrine therapy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The benefit of chemotherapy was deemed to be low (1.3% PREDICT logarithm) and was not pursued.1 R completed adjuvant radiotherapy to the left chest wall (26Gray in five fractions) and commenced letrozole.
Two years following radiotherapy, R presented with petechial bruising over her left chest wall. Punch biopsy showed angiosarcoma. She had further radiological investigations, including a staging computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (Figure 1) and fluorodeoxygenase positron emission tomography. These detected a pulmonary embolus, for which she was started on rivaroxaban, and multiple small lung nodules that had a benign appearance.
View Figure 1–3.
R proceeded to a left mastectomy with latissimus dorsi flap and split skin graft at a specialist sarcoma centre. Histology showed a 210x150x5mm-deep angiosarcoma with widely clear margins. Immunohistochemistry studies with positive cell markers, such as c-Myc, favoured radiation-induced angiosarcoma (RAAS) rather than primary angiosarcoma. Given these findings, sarcoma MDM concluded that no further treatment was required.
Three months later, new petechial skin changes developed over the surgical site (Figure 2). Punch biopsy confirmed angiosarcoma recurrence.
Repeat scans showed new pulmonary nodules, suspicious for metastases. R had wider excision of the left posterior chest wall area with 5cm margins deep to muscle and fascia, and split skin grafting (Figure 3). Histology showed further multifocal angiosarcoma over an area of 185x110x50mm, with microscopic disease present at deep margins.
Any further surgery now would require extensive chest wall reconstruction with significant associated morbidity. It was agreed that this would not be appropriate, and R was referred to medical oncology to discuss suppressive systemic treatments. She has completed palliative chemotherapy with paclitaxel. Her last CT scan, 7 months after her last operation, showed stable disease.
RAAS is a rare but severe complication of radiotherapy with an incidence rate of about 0.05–0.3% in patients who have had treatment after breast-conserving surgery.1 It carries a poor prognosis, with a reported 5-year mortality of 32%.2,3 Pathogenesis of the disease appears to be related to a combination of factors, including radiation-induced DNA damage and lymphoedema.2
Initial presentation of RAAS can include a petechial rash, skin thickening or nodules over the area directly exposed to radiation. However, this can have a latency period of more than a decade following radiotherapy completion, with a median latency time of 6–11 years.4 Tissue biopsy is vital for diagnosis. This particular case is significant in that R presented within 2 years post-radiotherapy with cutaneous symptoms.
While a wider excision or mastectomy to clear margins is generally accepted, it is not always adequate to prevent local recurrence. Other approaches have suggested complete resection of all irradiated tissues to prevent local recurrence.5 Despite achieving R0 resection on mastectomy, R still developed early local recurrence with progressive metastatic disease. This may be related to initial tumour seeding at time of index excision, prior radiotherapy-induced tissue changes or the multifocal infiltrative nature of RAAS.6 Current literature debates the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with few case reports suggesting improvement in achieving R0 resection.6 RAAS remains a challenging disease to manage and treatment requires close collaboration with specialist sarcoma services.
Dr Jennifer Zhou, MB ChB: General Surgery Registrar, Southland Hospital, New Zealand.
Dr Alice Febery, MB ChB, FRACS: General Surgeon, Southland Hospital, New Zealand.
Dr Jennifer Zhou, MB ChB: General Surgery Registrar, Southland Hospital, New Zealand.
Nil.
1) Cozzi S, Najafi M, Bardoscia L, et al. Radiation-induced breast angiosarcoma: report of two patients after accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and review of the literature. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021;26(5):827-832. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0080.
2) Mery CM, George S, Bertagnolli MM, Raut CP. Secondary sarcomas after radiotherapy for breast cancer: sustained risk and poor survival. Cancer. 2009 Sep 15;115(18):4055-4063. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24462.
3) Depla AL, Scharloo-Karels CH, de Jong MAA, et al. Treatment and prognostic factors of radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) after primary breast cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jul 1;50(10):1779-1788.
4) Jackson KM, Grumley JG. Radiation-Induced Breast Angiosarcoma: Updates on a Rare Disease. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2024 Jun;16(2):177-184. doi: 10.1007/s12609-024-00542-5.
5) Cohen-Hallaleh RB, Smith HG, Smith RC, et al. Radiation induced angiosarcoma of the breast: outcomes from a retrospective case series. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2017;7:15. doi: 10.1186/s13569-017-0081-7.
6) Şeber ES, İriagac Y, Çavdar E, et al. A logarithmic model for hormone receptor-positive and breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023;69(3):434-439. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20221255.
Sign in to view your account and access
the latest publications by the NZMJ.
Don't have an account?
Let's get started with creating an account.
Already have an account?
Become a member to enjoy unlimited digital access and support the ongoing publication of the New Zealand Medical Journal.
The New Zealand Medical Journal is fully available to individual subscribers and does not incur a subscription fee. This applies to both New Zealand and international subscribers. Institutions are encouraged to subscribe. The value of institutional subscriptions is essential to the NZMJ, as supporting a reputable medical journal demonstrates an institution’s commitment to academic excellence and professional development. By continuing to pay for a subscription, institutions signal their support for valuable medical research and contribute to the journal's continued success.
Please email us at nzmj@pmagroup.co.nz