Childhood blindness, while representing only 5% of worldwide blindness, ranks second as the leading cause of “blind years”.
Full article available to subscribers
Childhood blindness, while representing only 5% of worldwide blindness, ranks second as the leading cause of “blind years”. One-point-five million blind children account for 70 million blind years.1 Childhood blindness definitions vary from visual acuity of less than 3/60 in the better eye (World Health Organization [WHO]) to 6/24 or less in Aotearoa New Zealand.1,2 Children under the age of 5 years have the highest incidence of blindness. Early onset blindness adversely affects the development of psychomotor, social and emotional skills. In addition to disability affecting their opportunities for education, employment and earning potential, blind children have a higher mortality rate.3
In New Zealand, more population data on childhood blindness have been published in recent years, but knowledge gaps remain. We, therefore, often extrapolate from Australian data; however, our populations differ. In New Zealand, the burden of blindness is inequitable, with nearly a quarter of blind children being Māori.3 The leading causes of childhood blindness in New Zealand are cortical vision impairment (CVI; 31.5%), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP; 18.2%) and optic nerve hypoplasia (ONH; 9%).4 In 2023, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists (RANZCO) published Vision 2030 and Beyond, which aims to provide a road map to deliver better eye care nationwide despite challenging resource constraints in the public health sector.2 This article aims to review New Zealand’s specific prevention strategies for childhood blindness.
The prevalence of childhood blindness in New Zealand has been reported as 5 per 10,000 children.3 We do not have data on incidence currently.
In Australia, the prevalence of childhood blindness is fairly similar at 3.4 per 10,000 children, and the incidence rate is close to one per 10,000 live births.5 Estimated direct healthcare costs in Australia have been evaluated at around AU$30,000 per year per child, while indirect costs such as education, support services and caregivers’ loss of productivity have been estimated at around AU$45,000 per year per child.5,6 The health burden in terms of Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) lost due to paediatric visual impairment in Australia has been estimated at 7,011 annually.6 Using an estimated Value of a Statistical Life Year of AU$187,200, the total monetary value of the disease burden of 7,011 DALYs amounts to AU$1.3 billion in 2015.6
CVI is a decreased visual response to a stimulus due to brain injury rather than ocular disease. Brain injury can occur before, during or shortly after birth.7 CVI is the leading cause of preventable childhood blindness in high-income countries, with as many as 50% of cases being preventable.8 CVI accounts for 31.5% of childhood blindness in New Zealand.4 Of these cases, CVI is idiopathic in 36% but is caused by perinatal hypoxia/asphyxia in 18–25% and non-accidental injury in 8%.7 Rarer causes include hydrocephalus, severe epilepsy, neonatal central nervous system infections, prematurity or genetic conditions. It has also been associated with antenatal maternal drug use. There is no treatment for CVI; therefore, prevention is a priority.7 To reduce the prevalence and impact of this condition, we summarise potential interventions in Table 1.
View Table 1–9.
ROP affects premature infants weighing ≤1,250 grams and born before 30 weeks gestation. It is caused by incomplete retinal vascularisation secondary to oxygen-induced damage, although rates have been lower in recent years. There are multiple risk factors, including gestational weight/age and oxygen supplementation. ROP can lead to a spectrum of visual changes ranging from myopia, strabismus, amblyopia and anisometropia to blindness from retinal detachment.9 Worldwide, ROP is the primary cause of blindness in premature infants. In New Zealand, ROP accounts for an estimated 18% of childhood blindness and low vision.4 There is a higher rate of prematurity among Māori children.9 To reduce the prevalence of this condition, we summarise potential interventions in Table 2.
ONH is a congenital condition in which the optic nerve under-develops during pregnancy. It can present unilaterally or bilaterally and is not progressive.10,11 It can occur in isolation; however, it is commonly associated with cerebral midline structure abnormalities and pituitary axis hormone deficiencies.11 In New Zealand, ONH accounts for an estimated 9% of childhood blindness and low vision.4 It is the third most common cause of visual impairment in Māori children. Visual acuity can range from near normal to no light perception. A current hypothesis is that ONH is caused by vascular disruption during pregnancy. The risk factors are increased first-trimester bleeding, maternal smoking, maternal alcohol consumption, young maternal age, maternal diabetes, preterm labour, primiparity and use of abortifacients, anticonvulsants or antidepressants.10 There is no treatment for ONH; therefore, prevention is a priority.8 To reduce the prevalence of this condition, we summarise potential interventions in Table 3.
In 2006, the WHO recognised uncorrected RE as an important cause of vision loss. By broadening this definition, the estimated total number of visually impaired people worldwide effectively doubled.12 Twelve-point-eight million children aged 5–15 years are visually impaired from uncorrected RE worldwide, representing 8.3% of all visual impairment. There are three main types of RE: myopia, hyperopia (or hypermetropia) and astigmatism.13 In New Zealand, an estimated 24% of 7–10-year-olds had RE on a recent school-based screening project. Only half of those children were regularly wearing glasses.14
Myopia is predominantly caused by an increased axial length. While genetics play an important role, increasing evidence suggests that environmental factors—particularly limited exposure to natural light and extended periods of near work (such as reading, screen use or other close-up visual tasks) in low-light conditions—also contribute significantly.15 There are predictions that half the world will be myopic by 2050.16 Hyperopia is thought to be genetic and can delay visual development. It is a significant risk factor for strabismus and amblyopia. Astigmatism is mainly caused by an excessive corneal curvature. RE commonly coexists with other paediatric eye disorders. Therefore, the management and treatment of RE should be the initial strategy for all eye conditions.2,13 The main focus of RE prevention lies in preventing myopia and reducing the prevalence of this condition. We summarise potential interventions in Table 4.
Amblyopia can be caused by uncorrected RE, strabismus or deprivation. A 2022 review of 97 studies, including 4,645,274 children and 7,706 with amblyopia, reported an overall worldwide pooled prevalence of amblyopia of 1.36%.17 The only New Zealand data detected a prevalence of 1.8%.18 The National Vision and Hearing Screening Protocols, updated in 2021, specify the training and procedural requirements for vision-hearing technicians responsible for conducting childhood vision screening during the B4 School Check for 4–5-year-old children.19 The uptake of such screening in New Zealand is 92%.19 The long-term functional impacts of living with amblyopia are limited, and the main consequence of childhood amblyopia is bilateral vision impairment if loss of vision in the better eye occurs. Two New Zealand studies have shown a low positive predictive value (31%) but also a high negative predictive value (98%) for screening, so there is scope for optimising the prevention of childhood amblyopia. Firstly, the uptake of New Zealand screening should be increased to match the rates of 99% in Europe. Secondly, the screening protocol could be refined to target the detection of amblyopia with visual acuity of 6/15 or worse, as individuals with 6/12 vision in an amblyopic eye generally retain sufficient visual function for driving, employment and everyday tasks. Thirdly, it is important to ensure that bilateral amblyopia, representing roughly 6% of all cases, is reliably detected across all screenings. The revised 2021 national protocol supports the adoption of an automated refraction device, which will contribute to improved outcomes.20 To reduce the prevalence of this condition, we summarise potential interventions in Table 5.
Keratoconus is characterised by progressive corneal thinning and protrusion, leading to irregular astigmatism and visual impairment. It is a bilateral, asymmetrical disease that develops during or before puberty.21 As keratoconus ectasia progresses, vision correction requires glasses, specially fitted (and expensive) contact lenses and, potentially, corneal transplant surgery. The prevalence is estimated at 1.38 per 1,000 people globally.22 In Wellington high school students, keratoconus affected one in 45 Māori students, compared with one in 191 New Zealand European adolescents. This study also found that eight out of 10 individuals with keratoconus identified by screening were unaware they had this condition and thus were not actively seeking appropriate care.23 Therefore, in New Zealand, we have substantially higher rates, with an overall prevalence of 5.2 per 1,000 and up to 22.2 per 1,000 among our Māori population. Multiple New Zealand studies have demonstrated that Māori and Pacific people have a higher prevalence of keratoconus, present with more severe disease and have a more rapidly progressing disease form.23,24 As a result, New Zealand has the highest proportion of corneal transplants for keratoconus among the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries.25 To prevent vision loss and decrease disease burden, timely diagnosis and management of keratoconus are crucial. Early detection with diagnostic imaging modalities, such as corneal topography or tomography, leads to early intervention in the form of corneal cross-linking, which is effective at stopping the progression of ectasia. A Cochrane review found an 80–90% relative risk reduction in progression over 12 months following corneal cross-linking.26 This intervention is also cost effective.25 We propose a targeted screening programme for keratoconus in New Zealand for high-risk populations. Automated refraction and corneal topography could easily be incorporated into the National Vision and Hearing Screening Programme for children in Year 7 (ages 11 and 12). Further screening should be undertaken in the later teen years to rescreen for new cases of keratoconus. Several pilot studies are currently underway in New Zealand to identify the most cost-effective screening methods. To reduce the prevalence of this condition, we summarise potential interventions in Table 6.
Genetic eye diseases are now a leading cause of childhood blindness. Their impact on vision ranges from mild (particularly in carriers) to bilaterally blinding, and they may be associated with systemic syndromic manifestations. Hereditary eye conditions include congenital cataracts, congenital glaucoma, inherited retinal dystrophies, retinoblastoma (RB), optic atrophy and eye malformations (including corneal opacities), along with other rarer conditions. The main inherited retinal dystrophies are retinitis pigmentosa (54%), Stargardt disease (12%) and macular dystrophy (8%), as highlighted in a 20-year retrospective observational study in Western Australia.27 RB is a malignant ocular tumour with an incidence of 1/18,000 live births. With early detection, survival rates for RB are more than 95%, but it can be associated with significant visual impairment post-treatment.8 Preventive measures for genetic eye disease in New Zealand include genetic counselling for affected people considering their pregnancy options and pre-implantation genetic testing to select embryos that do not carry the gene for the disease. Early diagnosis, counselling and support are essential for people who are carriers of genetic disease or parents of children born with genetic eye disease. Ophthalmology is leading human genetic therapies with approximately 10 approved genetic eye therapies worldwide, and the first New Zealand child was treated recently with Luxturna.28 To reduce the prevalence of these conditions, we summarise potential interventions in Table 7.
The most significant advance in paediatric ophthalmology in the twentieth century was childhood vaccination. The following infections can all result in visual impairment or blindness; however, vaccines are available to prevent their occurrence. These are mainly but not limited to rubella (congenital cataract, keratitis, Fuchs heterochromic iridocyclitis, glaucoma); measles (keratitis, uveitis, optic neuritis); mumps (keratitis, retinitis, optic neuritis); Corynebacterium diphtheriae (corneal scarring); Streptococcus pneumoniae (keratitis, endophthalmitis); Neisseria meningitidis (conjunctivitis, endophthalmitis); Haemophilus influenzae type b (orbital cellulitis, uveitis, vaso-occlusive retinal vasculitis, neuroretinitis, exudative retinal detachment, optic neuritis); varicella and herpes zoster (keratitis, uveitis, chorioretinal scars).31 The recent measles outbreak in Samoa and New Zealand highlights the need for ongoing and widespread emphasis on vaccination requirements. This has become an increasing challenge since the COVID-19 pandemic and the rise of anti-vaccine ideology. To reduce the prevalence of these conditions, we summarise potential interventions in Table 8.
It is estimated that each year, 3.3–5.7 million eye injuries affect children worldwide.32 In 2019, the New Zealand childhood ocular trauma study determined an incidence of 719 cases per 100,000 children per year.33 This study also highlighted that they occurred more commonly in males (63.2%), between the ages of 0 and 4 years (30.7%) and among those of New Zealand European ethnicity (60.8%). These injuries predominantly involved being “struck by an object” (53.7%), were typically in the home setting (50.9%) and reported protective eyewear use was very low at the time of injury (2.7%). Around one-fifth of cases (19.7%) admitted for tertiary assessment and treatment had final visual outcomes that were 6/12 or less, and Māori and Pacific people were over-represented in that category.33 To further compound these statistics, up to 90% of ocular traumas are preventable. Prevention strategies, such as parental education, legislation (e.g., restriction on sales of hazardous toys and lasers) and the introduction of eyewear protection (e.g., for sporting activities, especially cycling, football and ball sports) effectively reduce the incidence of ocular trauma.32 RANZCO also recommends developing and implementing a national strategy and awareness campaign to prevent ocular trauma.2 To reduce the prevalence of ocular trauma, we summarise potential interventions in Table 9.
While less common than adult blindness, childhood blindness in New Zealand has a significant burden in terms of the total burden of blind years. Many prevention strategies must be initiated well before vision loss occurs, and ophthalmology care can typically only prevent the worsening of vision rather than the restoration of vision. Ophthalmologists and RANZCO must continue to actively collaborate with obstetricians, paediatricians, general practitioners, optometrists, national screening units, vaccination programmes, epidemiologists and Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora to promote primary prevention strategies and improve visual outcomes for our tamariki.
While less common than adult blindness, childhood blindness has a significant burden in terms of the total number of “blind years”. We aim to determine if there is scope for improved strategies in the prevention of childhood blindness in Aotearoa New Zealand.
We conducted a review of New Zealand childhood blindness data.
In New Zealand, there is a paucity of data on childhood blindness. However, significant scope remains for prevention through optimising maternal health, neonatal care, increasing uptake of immunisations and attendance at vision screening programmes, as well as the earliest possible detection of myopia and keratoconus.
Ophthalmologists and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists must continue to actively collaborate with obstetricians, paediatricians, general practitioners, optometrists, national screening units, vaccination programmes, epidemiologists and Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora to promote primary prevention strategies and improve visual outcomes for our tamariki.
Dr Madelyne Jouart: Ophthalmology Registrar, Ophthalmology Department, University of Otago, Christchurch, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Dr Elizabeth Conner: Consultant Ophthalmologist, Ophthalmology Department, University of Otago, Christchurch, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Dr Jason Rodier: Consultant Ophthalmologist, Ophthalmology Department, Gisborne, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Associate Professor Graham Wilson: Consultant Ophthalmologist, Ophthalmology Department, University of Otago, Christchurch, Aotearoa New Zealand.
We would like to give special thanks to Professor Nick Wilson (co-head of the Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand) for his valuable input in the write-up of this paper.
Dr Madelyne Jouart: Ophthalmology Registrar, Ophthalmology Department, University of Otago, Christchurch, Aotearoa New Zealand.
J Rodier has received payment or honoraria from the University of Sydney Microsurgery Course as a lecturer and for providing tutorial.
1) World Health Organization. Preventing blindness in children [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2024 Apr 7]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/66663/WHO_PBL_00.77.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
2) Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. RANZCO’s Vision for Aotearoa New Zealand’s Eye Healthcare to 2030 and beyond [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 7]. Available from: https://ranzco.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/NZ-Vision-2030_FINAL.pdf
3) Chong CF, McGhee CN, Dai S. A Cross-sectional Study of Prevalence and Etiology of Childhood Visual Impairment in Auckland, New Zealand. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2014;3(6):337-342. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000044.
4) Chong C, McGhee CNJ, Dai SH. Causes of childhood low vision and blindness in New Zealand. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;47(2):165-170. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13443.
5) Vision 2020 Australia. National Eye Health Survey Report [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Aug 22]. Available from: https://www.vision2020australia.org.au/resources/national-eye-health-survey-report/
6) Grigg J, Jamieson R. Socioeconomic impact of low vision and blindness from paediatric eye disease in Australia [Internet]. Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney; 2016 Jul 15 [cited 2024 Aug 22]. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.sydney.edu.au/content/dam/corporate/documents/save-sight-institute/save-sight-institute-socioeconomic-impact-report.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwj0pJmXqoiIAxVZwjgGHaF7CwEQFnoECBoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw07FUOa_yoP8TDw7rynJuCp
7) Hoyt CS. Visual function in the brain-damaged child. Eye (Lond). 2003 Apr;17(3):369-384. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700364.
8) Simkin S, Ziaei M. Paediatric visual impairment [Internet]. New Zealand Doctor; 2022 Feb 16 [cited 2024 Aug 22]. Available from: https://www.nzdoctor.co.nz/article/educate/how-treat/paediatric-visual-impairment
9) Newborn Clinical Network. Consensus statement for screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity [Internet]. Starship; 2023 Feb 3 [cited 2024 Aug 22]. Available from: https://starship.org.nz/guidelines/consensus-statement-for-screening-for-retinopathy-of-prematurity/#:~:text=Data%20from%20the%20Australian%20and
10) Garcia-Filion P, Borchert M. Prenatal determinants of optic nerve hypoplasia: review of suggested correlates and future focus. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov-Dec;58(6):610-619. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.02.004.
11) Goh YW, Andrew D, McGhee C, Dai S. Clinical and demographic associations with optic nerve hypoplasia in New Zealand. 2014 Oct;98(10):1364-1367. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304605.
12) United Nations. Test and glasses could dramatically improve lives of 150 million with poor vision – UN [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2025 Nov 27]. Available from: https://news.un.org/en/story/2006/10/195752
13) Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP.. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Jan;86(1):63-70. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.041210.
14) Findlay RW, Goodman LK, Anstice NS, et al. Refractive errors, amblyopia risk factors and vision screening in children aged 7-10 years in Aotearoa New Zealand. Clin Exp Optom. 2025 Aug 7;108(6):700-705. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2024.2410036.
15) Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J, et al. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1279-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.12.019.
16) Zadnik K, Schulman E, Flitcroft I, et al. Efficacy and Safety of 0.01% and 0.02% Atropine for the Treatment of Pediatric Myopia Progression Over 3 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct 1;141(10):990-999. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.2097. Erratum in: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct 1;141(10):1005. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.4206.
17) Hu B, Liu Z, Zhao J, et al. The Global Prevalence of Amblyopia in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Pediatr. 2022 May 4;10:819998. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.819998.
18) Wilson GA, Welch D. Does amblyopia have a functional impact? Findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;41(2):127-134. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02842.x.
19) Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora. The B4 School Check [Internet]. 2024 Jul 9 [cited 2025 Sep 14]. Available from: https://info.health.nz/services-support/pregnancy-birth-and-children-services/well-child-tamariki-ora/the-b4-school-check
20) Muller W, Mitchell L, Wilson G. Vision screening in New Zealand: an audit of the B4 School Check. N Z Med J. 2019;132(1491):63-70.
21) Li X, Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K, Yang H. Longitudinal study of the normal eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients. Ophthalmology. 2004 Mar;111(3):440-446. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.020.
22) Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Hooshmand E, et al. The Prevalence and Risk Factors for Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cornea. 2020 Feb;39(2):263-720. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002150.
23) Papali’i-Curtin AT, Cox R, et al. Keratoconus Prevalence Among High School Students in New Zealand. Cornea. 2019 Nov;38(11):1382-1389. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31335534/
24) Owens H, Gamble GD, Bjornholdt MC, et al. Topographic indications of emerging keratoconus in teenage New Zealanders. Cornea. 2007;26(3):312-318. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31802f8d87.
25) Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, et al. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea. 2015 Apr;34(4):359-369. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000408.
26) Sykakis E, Karim R, Evans JR, et al. Corneal collagen cross-linking for treating keratoconus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 24;2015(3):CD010621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010621.pub2.
27) Heath Jeffery RC, Mukhtar SA, McAllister IL, et al. Inherited retinal diseases are the most common cause of blindness in the working-age population in Australia. Ophthalmic Genet. 2021 Aug;42(4):431-439. doi: 10.1080/13816810.2021.1913610. Erratum in: Ophthalmic Genet. 2021 Dec;42(6):790. doi: 10.1080/13816810.2021.1976939.
28) Jones D. The case for funding Luxturna in NZ [Internet]. New Zealand Optics; 2022 Aug 1 [cited 2025 Feb 23]. Available from: https://nzoptics.co.nz/live-articles/the-case-for-funding-luxturna-in-nz/
29) Newborn Clinical Network. Red reflex screening assessment in newborns and infants [Internet]. Starship; 2022 Oct 4 [cited 2025 Sep 14]. Available from: https://www.starship.org.nz/guidelines/red-reflex-screening-assessment-in-newborns-and-infants/
30) Vincent A. Save Sight Society NZ supporting research into retinal disease A/Prof Andrea Vincent [Internet]. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists; 2018 Nov 29 [cited 2025 Feb 23]. Available from: https://ranzco.edu/blog/save-sight-society-nz-supporting-research-into-retinal-disease-a-prof-andrea-vincent/
31) Mackey DA, Taylor H, Smith JR. Blindness: converting the vaccine-hesitant [Internet]. InSight. 2020 Feb 3 [cited 2024 Aug 22]. Available from: https://insightplus.mja.com.au/2020/4/blindness-converting-the-vaccine-hesitant/
32) Kadappu S, Silveira S, Martin F. Aetiology and outcome of open and closed globe eye injuries in children. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;41(5):427-434. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12034.
33) Ferguson RA, Sung J, McKelvie J. New Zealand childhood ocular trauma study: Analysis of 75 601 cases of ocular injury from 2007 to 2016. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;47(6):718-725. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13489.
Sign in to view your account and access
the latest publications by the NZMJ.
Don't have an account?
Let's get started with creating an account.
Already have an account?
Become a member to enjoy unlimited digital access and support the ongoing publication of the New Zealand Medical Journal.
The New Zealand Medical Journal is fully available to individual subscribers and does not incur a subscription fee. This applies to both New Zealand and international subscribers. Institutions are encouraged to subscribe. The value of institutional subscriptions is essential to the NZMJ, as supporting a reputable medical journal demonstrates an institution’s commitment to academic excellence and professional development. By continuing to pay for a subscription, institutions signal their support for valuable medical research and contribute to the journal's continued success.
Please email us at nzmj@pmagroup.co.nz